The authors claim that sugar plantations were violent systems, but sugar also led some people to reject slavery.
<h3>How do actors establish this claim?</h3>
- By showing how sugar farms were established.
- By showing what work was like on the sugar farms.
- By showing how slavery and sugar manufacturing are related.
- By showing how people reacted to this system.
The text shows how slavery was used to create sugar cane farms. This made the work to make the sugar very violent and exhausting, which made many people refuse this product.
The text to which this question is related is in the attached image.
Learn more about slavery:
brainly.com/question/9331183
#SPJ1
Answer:
You need to give the vocab words
Explanation:
Without knowing your vocab words or what the drop down menu says then we cant really answer this for you.
Another good reason to obtain citation information:
So that you can properly cite the source of the information in you’re writing.
Answer:
A picaresque novel depicts the hero of the story as someone who comes from a low social rank, finding ways to survive in a corrupt world.
The Spanish novella Lazarillo de Tormes was banned by the Spanish Inquisition and rather included in the Index of the Forbidden Books of the Spanish Inquisition for its heretical contents and the depiction of the young boy Lazaro's upbringing by a blind beggar after the death of his thief father.
Explanation:
A picaresque novel is a book of prose that tells the adventures of a 'hero" who is not the typical hero type, but rather roguish and mostly from the lower ranks of the society. The protagonist of this type of novel comes from the low social rank, and has to survive using his wits and conscience to survive in a corrupt world.
Lazarillo de Tormes, a Spanish novella published anonymously that tells the story of a poor boy Lazaro, was banned by the Spanish Crown for its depiction of the boy's life in a picaresque way. The novella was instead included in the Index of the Forbidden Books of the Spanish Inquisition for its heretical contents. The story dealing with the upbringing of the poor boy by a blind beggar after the death of his thief father was 'unethical' of a novel, thus the ban. The very nature of a picaresque novel on delineating the numerous professions and social statuses is also evident in this novel, leading to it being deemed 'unfit' to be read. And even when published, the Crown made sure to omit Chapters 4 and 5.
The mood gradually becomes hella depressing because their son dies and all that.
