Answer:
2.67 and 4.67 I think .........
The answer is 35/6. Hope you get it!
<span>Quincy
says that 3 is a good estimate for 3.4 X 0.09, is she correct? Why?
When we say estimates meaning it is not the exact answer but close to what is
the exact.
Now, if Quincy estimated 3 as the product of 3.4 * .09, then let’s check if she
has the correct estimates.
=> 3.4 estimates is 3
=> 0.09 estimates is 0.1
Now the answer is 0.3 and not 3.
Thus, Quincy’s estimate is wrong.</span>
Answer:
$12
Step-by-step explanation:
1.75/3= 0.6 (1dp)
0.6 x 20 = 12
Answer:
<em>Most likely time, </em>according to PERT (Program evaluation and review technique).
Step-by-step explanation:
PERT is "a statistical tool used in <em>project management" (Program evaluation and review technique (2020), </em>in Wikipedia), and it is commonly used with CPM <em>(Critical Path Method)</em> to manage projects.
Inside PERT, there are different defined times to accomplished an activity in a project, that is:
- An <em>optimistic time</em> or minimum time required to accomplished an activity, i.e., if everything goes better than normal, the activity is accomplished before expected.
- A <em>pessimistic time, </em>a time quite the opposite to optimistic time.
- A <em>most likely time</em>, or a time required to accomplished an activity if everything goes as expected or normally.
- An <em>expected time</em>, an statistical estimation.
Considering the question, we have that the <em>time</em> when "the first module of the project could be completed":
- "[...] in as few as 15 days" is the <em>optimistic time</em>.
- "[...] or could take as many as 25 days" is the <em>pessimistic time</em>.
- "[...] but most likely will require 20 days" is the <em>most likely time</em>.
As a result, the <em>20-day estimate</em> is called the <em>most likely time</em> in the context of the PERT/CPM techniques.
