Answer:
C. The appropriate balance between observing social injustice and seeking social justice.
Explanation:
This issue is strongly debated by modern-day sociologists, because our social order seems to be innately unjust. There are people who start from worse premises than others, there are people who earn less than others and people who will earn more and there is no society without inequality.
<em>This inequality is considered "social injustice" by modern-day sociologists and philosophers, whereas other voices claim that this kind of "injustice" is not something which can be corrected. </em>
<em>The main idea is that there will always be inequalities in any given society. </em>However, <u>the big question is how big these inequalities should be and how much state interference should there be to diminish these inequalities? </u>Moreover, even with state interference, could inequalities ever be wiped out?
This is what modern-day sociologists are trying to answer, in order to build better societies without imposing too many things on individuals who are faring better than others just by birth.
A southern region and peninsula of Asia mostly situated on the Indian plate and projecting southwards into the Indian Ocean from the Himalayas
Fun facts.
If you find a machine which goes in a speed of 3×10^8 m/sec, you can see the past and future. You can even travel for longer distant objects like stars
A primary source comes from a first-hand witness's point of view which makes the information from that source more valid than a secondary.
The English passed the Intolerable Acts to punish the colonists for the Boston Tea Party. Hope that helps!
