Hello
We can approach science from various angles. It may be that our aim is to solve a problem or to try to understand something. But, at the same time, what we find in it as explanatory or credible may be different if our profession is to be a trader, an importer of industrial equipment, a researcher or a teacher. Our concerns about science may differ according to the angle from which we think about it. That is to say, what is important when judging or evaluating science is different according to our relationship with it at certain times: whether we see it as producers, disseminators or consumers. Therefore, from the outset we have an area of complexity in thinking about science from our starting point.
Answer: Twice the previous time would be taken to reach the same speed v with the puck of mass 2m.
Explanation:
Let a Force pushes the hockey puck of mass m.
Then acceleration, a= \frac{F}{m}a=mF
From the equation of motion,
\begin{gathered}\➪ v=u+at\\ v=0+\frac{F}{m}\Delta t\end{gathered}⇒v=u+atv=0+mFΔt ......(1)
In the second case, when mass is 2m, then acceleration,
a'=\frac{F}{2m}a′=2mF
and t' is the time taken.
The final speed is v,
\begin{gathered}\➪ v=0+ a't'\\ \➪ \frac {F}{m}\Delta t=\frac{F}{2m}t'\\ \➪ t'= 2\Delta t\end{gathered}⇒v=0+a′t′⇒mFΔt=2mFt′⇒t′=2Δt using equation (1)
Hence, it would take two times the previous amount of time to push the pluck of double mass.
<em><u> </u></em><em><u>I</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>hope</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>this</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>is</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>understandable</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>and</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>if</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>my</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>answer</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>helped</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>you</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>please</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>can</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>you</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>give</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>me</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>brainliest</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>its</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>will</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>really</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>help</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>me</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>and</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>thank</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>you</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>have</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>nice</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>day</u></em><em><u>!</u></em><em><u>!</u></em>
Answer: When there is a solid yellow line on your side of the roadway. A school bus is loading or unloading children. Attempting to pass a long line of vehicles. A vehicle ahead has indicated an intention to turn or stop.
Explanation:
The information that the dialogue revealed was that the guards do not recognize each other at first.
From the complete question, we can deduce that the <em>guards </em>didn't <em>recognize </em>each other at first. Bernardo didn't see Francisco properly at first and he thought that he was the king before he saw him clearly.
A dialogue simply refers to a conversation between two to more people. The effect of the <em>dialogue</em> was that it caused a feeling of confusion and distrust. Bernardo and Francisco were confused.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/24953356