1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goldfiish [28.3K]
2 years ago
11

Not everyone suffered during the Great Depression. Timothy Eaton (Eaton Centre) did quite well. In your opinion, is it fair that

some do well white others are poor? Do they have a responsibility to help? Should everyone be guaranteed a job with a fair wage? What if that means people with money can't have as much?
History
2 answers:
hjlf2 years ago
8 0

Explanation:

hard question sir but i try to find

Juli2301 [7.4K]2 years ago
5 0

Answer: No sometimes it is unfair when others do well and some are well, but it is not their responsability to help. That being said not everyone will be guaranteed a job with fair wage.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which role did the Battle of Britain play in world war 2?? A: German. Victory lead the British to propose and An armistice betwe
GREYUIT [131]

Answer:

D: Britain's resistance of Germany's Air Force suspended Germany's land invasion of the nation

Explanation:

We can say that the Battle of Britain was Hitler's first retreat and, why not, his first defeat. Germany began the attacks in 1940. When it comes to the army commanded by Hitler, Great Britain managed to maintain air superiority, not in number, but in the speed of action in the confrontation of 1940. With the support given by Winston Churchill and his moral speech, Great Britain didn't surrender, which led Germany to retreat and Hitler to cancel his attempt to invade Great Britain. After that, he turns his eyes to the Soviet Union.

4 0
3 years ago
[50 PTS] + BRAINLIEST
neonofarm [45]

i belive it is b correct me if im wrong

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did British colonists want to do during the European wars of the 1700s??
Sidana [21]
Help britain............
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The leaders of the US, USSR, and Great Britain said they wanted to cooperate, so why were negotiations at the Yalta and Potsdam
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:  Each country had its own agenda about the post-war world.

Context/explanation:

Churchill in particular, along with Roosevelt, pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, "Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests.   So one key point of disagreement between Stalin and the other two was over the direction things would take in Eastern Europe after the war.

While Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were on the same page in many ways, there were also key differences between them.   As noted by The Churchill Project of Hillsdale College, "FDR, ever the optimist, believed (or wanted to believe) that Stalin could be convinced that the West was not committed to destruction of the Soviet regime."  Churchill had a much more skeptical view of Stalin and the Soviet Union and approached the relationship in a firmer fashion.  Roosevelt had hoped to continue cooperation with the USSR.  That changed under Truman, who took over the US Presidency after FDR's death.  Truman was strongly anti-communist in his stance.

Another difference between Roosevelt and Churchill pertained to colonialism and imperialism.  Again as noted by The Churchill Project:  "Over colonialism. Roosevelt firmly believed European colonialism had been a major cause of World War I, and that it had continued to be a source of international disputes and tensions before World War II. Churchill had sworn defend the realm, which, when he took office, included the British Empire."  As it happened, after World War II, colonialism's days were numbered and independence movements broke out around the world where imperial powers had dominated.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Would the Manhattan Project have been accomplished so quickly if we had not been at war at the time?
Ganezh [65]
No, because there would not have been a larger rush to finish the project
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following dances is correctly matched with its country of origin? A. Waltz—Venezuela B. Rumba—Italy C. Tango—Argent
    9·2 answers
  • Where did the biblical Abraham originally come from
    7·1 answer
  • If there was no civil war, would America still have slavery?
    13·1 answer
  • In many people’s eyes, the Lend-Lease Act was the end of American in World War II?
    6·2 answers
  • What the benefits of living in a permanent home vs. a nomadic home?
    10·1 answer
  • How did Lincoln think ending slavery would weaken the south? Did the Proclamation free any slaves?
    13·1 answer
  • What is a well-known ghetto during The Holocaust?
    9·1 answer
  • What battle convinced the French to declare war on the British?
    5·1 answer
  • Which word is an antonym for attract?
    10·1 answer
  • What happened to most of the people who went to California during the Gold Rush?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!