Those students used the central route to persuasion, and were influenced by the quality of the persuasive argument.
<h3>What is a persuasive argument?</h3>
This is the type of argument that the person arguing engages in because they want to get the other party to see their point of view.
The goal is to ensure that the person you are talking to buys your idea and works with it. The way people go about this argument is through the use of logic and reasoning.
The goal is to try to be able to get the other person to adopt your pattern of reasoning and also take action based on that.
This can be referred to as a call to action by appealing to the emotions and the reasoning of your audience.
Read more on persuasive argument here
brainly.com/question/1790640
#SPJ1
Hey there,
The answer to your question is - no cabinet member may be a member of Congress.
Hope this helps :))
<em>~Top♥</em>
Answer:
I think your right or it’s c
Explanation:
Please don’t be mad if you get it wrong
Answer:
The excerpt informs the reader that there were likely inaccuracies in the report provided to the court.
Explanation:
The above statement most appropriately relates that how the author's purpose of the given frame and the excerpt are distinct. It reveals that 'the excerpt aims to inform the readers about the imprecision involved in the report that was presented to the court' as the report says 'Faryad had pellets in his left arm' which is logically false if he was sitting on the bicycle with Iqbal who had in the right side and hence, the frame asserts a different story. That's how both are different from each other.
