Do you believe that the Miranda rights are used as a protector of a person’s rights or as a tool by criminals?

History

1 answer:

Romashka-Z-Leto [24]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Many people believe that if they are arrested and not "read their rights," they can escape punishment. This is false. But if the police fail to read a suspect his or her Miranda rights, the prosecutor can't use for most purposes anything the suspect says as evidence against the suspect at trial. Of course, as with nearly all legal rules, there are exceptions.

Explanation:

Im not very good wity explanations, but i hope this helps you out a bit.

(ง •_•)ง

You might be interested in

Which Enlightenment thinkers wrote the nonfiction essay on the republic?

Savatey [412]

Answer:

John Locke's

Explwho cicero is but the other ones wrong time besides lock

3 0

3 years ago

Pears’ soap makers used the same concept to compare __________.

Pepsi [2]

Father figures with childlike colonized people

6 0

4 years ago

I. Submarines and mines were an inexpensive and better way to engage battleships II. Convoys proved to be the most effective def

Varvara68 [4.7K]

If im correct the answer should be Submarines and mines were an inexpensive and better way to engage battleships. I hope this helps. let me know if it doesnt

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor was motivated by its need for raw materials, including __________.

Temka [501]

Answer: Oil.
Japan wanted southern Indochina's supply of oil as they were starved for it and unable to maintain their military. On the same day they attacked Pearl Harbour they also attacked the Philippines to gain access to this oil. The attack on Pearl Harbour was to prevent any armada of US ships from retaking the Philippines, which they succeeded at doing.

Hope I helped and please rate my answer :)

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Did technology or migration do more to change antebellum America?

Degger [83]

Answer: both

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago