hi there!
I believe the correct answer is C. Because the common characteristic of these mechanisms is that they all place more <u>power directly in the hands of voters, </u>as opposed to elected representatives. Direct democracy is therefore often seen as conflicting with representative democracy, in which voters elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf.
One way in which women played a role in the boycott of the American Revolution was through Republican Motherhood. This philosophy was that women should be active in revolutionary ideals, for the purpose of passing those values on to their children (specifically, the boys).
The Democratic-Republican party was founded based on <span>Thomas Jefferson's leadership and the Anti-Federalist ideology</span>. The answer to your question is A. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
First of all, who would be the one giving the task?
Second of all, the people must be able to accept change for them to experience change.
Third of all, who would take on the task? Which country/people? Who would provide the resources, fundings, & volunteers to help "improve" the world.
Fourth, what kind of improvements are we talking about? Is it really beneficial, or does it just help with foreign government agendas?
Fifth, would there be any "extra's" that those parts of the world have to take on? Would they be called upon later on to help even when they cannot? Help usually have strings attached, and they would force obligation on the beneficiary to return the favor at a later time.
Of course, if the parts of the world wants to be improved, and there is the resources and funds to do so, then yes, Roosevelt is right in "improving" those parts of the world.
~
