Answer:
Yes, the price discrimination will be successful.
Explanation:
According to the definition of elasticity of demand we can conclude that adults value more the consumption of lemonade, for that reason are willing to pay a higher price than kids, which has a larger portfolio of beverage to choose.
Answer:
The correct answer is c) undifferentiated targeting strategy.
Explanation:
An undifferentiated targeting strategy considers all possible buyers within the same reference group, which means that it does not determine specific conditions of a group of consumers to target it. Traditional marketing bases its strategy on the differentiated market, after in-depth studies about people's motivations, tastes, needs, etc. In this case Laelle does not use a specific strategy for the children who are supposed to be the main consumers, since for them it is indifferent if it is a child or adult who consumes their products.
Answer:
(D) Abby, Ben, and Clara
Explanation:
Given that each of the five citizens will share the cost of the public good equally (that is, $200 each), citizens who derive benefits greater than $200 are likely to vote in favor of an equal share of the cost since this option will result in a net benefit of the public good to them.
For instance, net benefit to Abby = $220 benefit - $200 cost = $20 net benefit.
On the other hand, citizens who derive benefits worth less than $200 are less likely to vote in favor of an equal share since an equal share will result in a net loss to them.
For instance, net loss to Matt = $120 benefit - $200 cost = $80 net loss.
Therefore, Abby ($220), Ben ($210) and Clara ($210) are likely to vote in favor of a proposal for an equal share of the cost, since the benefit they derive is greater than the cost in an equal share $200.
I would say that it would be the <u>rate of return</u> but i might be wrong
