1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marta [7]
2 years ago
8

I am not sure how to answer this question; Describe the Fugitive Slave Act in terms that show it did not go far enough. I know h

ow to answer describe the Fugitive Slave Act, but not the second part of the question in terms that show it did not go far enough?
History
1 answer:
muminat2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The Fugitive Slave Acts were a pair of federal laws that allowed for the capture and return of runaway enslaved people within the territory of the United States. Enacted by Congress in 1793, the first Fugitive Slave Act authorized local governments to seize and return escapees to their owners and imposed penalties on anyone who aided in their flight. Widespread resistance to the 1793 law led to the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which added more provisions regarding runaways and levied even harsher punishments for interfering in their capture. The Fugitive Slave Acts were among the most controversial laws of the early 19th century.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which statements best defines strong central government
Makovka662 [10]

Answer: A strong central government is where the national/federal government has primacy and the provinces/counties/states are primarily set up to manage the rules of the nation.

7 0
3 years ago
British frustration with the American colonies during the French and Indian War cited all of the following factors EXCEPT:
Viktor [21]

Answer: C.) British officers were often forced to serve in subordinate roles to their colonial counterparts.

For the most part, this was the opposite. The frustration was on the part of the colonial forces as they were often forced to serve in subordinate roles.

The clash of command was a serious problem for the militias. British officers generally regarded themselves as higher than colonial ones, which colonial officers considered an offence. The solution was to divide each militia unit into smalled commands, and to recommisision militia officers with a rank of captain and above with a rank of captain. This demoted all the high-ranking colonial officers and placed them as subordinate to British captains. The new system was extremely unpopular with colonials and caused many of them to resign from the military.

3 0
3 years ago
Spanish in Quincy still was a religious what
umka21 [38]
Religion is Christian
5 0
3 years ago
When was the Han Dynasty founded
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

202 BCE

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
By 1865, how many slaves were there roughly?
stepan [7]
There were approximately 130,000 slaves that signed up and fought in the civil war that ended in 1865
hope this helps
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many years passed between the building of the
    5·2 answers
  • Who founded jamestown?
    8·1 answer
  • _____ led a fight against Portuguese slave ships to stop slavery. a. Mansa Musa, c. Queen Dahi al-Khina b. The Bantu d. Queen Nz
    6·2 answers
  • _______ would best describe World War I.
    12·1 answer
  • How were European economic systems in the American colonies in the 1500s and 1600s different from existing economic systems in E
    7·2 answers
  • My question is the picture
    12·1 answer
  • What are the three ways you can tell if a site is credible and contains reliable information?
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes Woodrow Wilson's attitude at the beginning of World War I?
    11·2 answers
  • What were some reasons that Texas wanted to become part of the US?
    11·2 answers
  • Did Plato believe in monarchy
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!