Answer:
Explanation:
Wait do u go to jhs 194 cause I recognize ur name lol and I also got this question on my social studies post assessmen.
Answer: According to Tetlock argument, Expert with good predictive power should be willing to;
• EXPLORE DIVERSE INFORMATION AND ANALYTICAL MODEL
• CHALLENGE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM
• BE COMFORTABLE WITH COMPLEXITY AND UNCERTAINTY.
Therefore option b,c,e is the right answer.
Explanation: The predictive power of a scientist is the power a scientist has to generate a testable prediction, thereby making its theory to be a testable prediction.
For an expert to have good predictive power it must have the ability to explore diverse information and analytical model, because when you explore different information and analyse it in the best form, you will be able to postulate more information and discoveries, which can help you to predict a testable theory. By exploring you are trying to challenge conventional wisdom, of why should this be this?, You may get confused and uncertain at a point. But if he you have a good predictive power, you can be able to absorb it all to achieve your discovery and produce a scientific theory with a predictive power.
Answer:
I dont understand that question
Explanation:
Answer:
Globalization also have its side effects to the developed nations. These include some factors which are jobs insecurity, fluctuation in prices, terrorism, fluctuation in currency, capital flows and so on.
Explanation:
Answer:
b. injury
Explanation:
According to the theory of social harm, immoral acts can be distinguished from crime on the basis of the injury they cause. This means that acts are considered immoral if they cause significant injury, or harm, to society. This view of morality emphasizes the consequence of the acts, and places this as the most important factor when deciding the ethical character of actions.
