The immigration has changed since the Clinton administration as:
<h3>The 1996
Immigration Reform</h3>
The outcome of this reform was to all IIRIRA, all noncitizens, and it is one that does not look at legal status and it was one that was subject to removal and largely widen the offenses that may bring about formal deportation.
The Immigration Act of 1990 brought about a new immigration category known to be the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program as issued visas only to immigrants who are said to be citizens of countries from which one had little more than 50,000 immigrants came to the United States in course of the previous five years.
Note that In 1996, Bill Clinton was said to have signed an immigration law that was said to have had a bad impact on millions of people of the world.
Learn more about immigration from
brainly.com/question/24475673
#SPJ1
The wish that Emperor Vespasian granted to Yohanan Ben Zakkai was B. To preserve the sacred scrolls and texts.
<h3>What did Yohanan Ben Zakkai do?</h3>
When Israel rebelled against the Romans, Emperor Vespasian came to Israel to destroy it. When he got to Jerusalem, he told the people to give up and that he would spare them if they did.
They refused but Yohanan Ben Zakkai tried to reason with them. When they agains refused, Yohanan Ben Zakkai spoke to Vespasian and asked that the sacred scrolls and texts be preserved. He granted this wish and kept it after the fall of Jerusalem.
Find out more on Yohanan Ben Zakkai at brainly.com/question/7619337
#SPJ1
It was the issue of state's rights that most directly contributed to the advent of a two party system in the 19th century, with the Democrats generally in favor of Southern state's rights and the Whigs in favor or more national unity. This of course was related to economic issues in the sense that the Democrats were defending slavery.
Anyone should have the right to express their views verbally. if a censorship was put on someone expressing their views verbally, no matter how ridiculous and offensive they sound, it would be unconstitutional and could lead to further restraints on the freedom of the people.
