Answer:
Plato believed that the aristocracy would allow only people with the right intellect to rule the country efficiently. He believed that aristocracy was the combination of wisdom and virtue and that this is reserved for only a limited number of noble citizens who have full access to the highest quality education.
Explanation:
The aristocracy is a way of establishing a national government through specific people in society who would have all the power of governance in a country. These people would be chosen through noble lineage and wealth.
Aristoteles and Plato were great supporters of these systems, as they believed that only people with full access to quality education would have sufficient ethical and moral intellect to be a head of government. Only nobles had this access.
These philosophers believed that the aristocracy was much better than democracy, because democracy gave freedom to anyone to stand for political office, in addition to allowing people who had no access to education and therefore a "low intellect" to choose those who would represent the government.
Although today, some people believe that the aristocracy is a good form of government, we know that it is not right to believe that. This is because keeping a country's governance power in the hands of a single family, where the post of head of state is chosen through a lineage is very dangerous.
Democracy allows us to remove tyrannical and inefficient leaders from power and choose that candidate who represents ideas that will benefit the country and lead its people to advance.
The general purpose of speech is to inform. The universally useful of any discourse will be either to Inform; Motivate/Persuade, or Entertain your group of onlookers. When you know the broadly useful of your discourse you can build up your Specific Purpose Statement. Your Specific Purpose Statement is utilized to build up your discourse.
Answer:
False
Explination:
this statement would be true providing that both parents were at home caring for their children for equal amounts of time because that would limit gender-stereotyped beliefs as both parents (not just the mother) commits to parenting.
As Adele could only remember the items from the end of the list, this is an example of the recency effect.
In the field of psychology, the recency effect can be described as an effect in which a person is able to only remember recent memories and forget the older ones.
According to the recency effect, such items or things that occurred last are remembered whereas the other ones are forgotten.
In the scenario mentioned in the question, Adele manages to remember those items that were at the end of the list from the things he had to buy from the grocery store but he forgets those items that were in the beginning hence this is an example of the recency effect.
To learn about the recency effect, click here:
brainly.com/question/8653544
#SPJ4
Short Answer:
George Washington wanted to stay as a neutral party and not be involved in a war with Britain again.
Longish answer:
George Washington chose to stay as a neutral party because they were still slightly recovering from the independent war, but since both sides started to legally kidnap their soldiers and force them to fight for their armies. Thus America was forced into the war.
