Because it is old. it has more worth, a better understanding
Answer:
Explanation:
The correct answer is: Paragraph 1 uses objective language, while paragraph 2 uses subjective language.
Lets take into consideration that subjective language uses personal opinions, points of view, emotions or judment. Objective language tires to give facts taht can be compared to reality, that means, facts that can be observed by everyone.
In the first paragraph, the author limits to describe the facts, describing the injuries and the actions commited by Santiego Lopez and the league. In this way the reader (us) will take all that information and decide wether the league is righ or wrong.
In the second paragraph the author already did that job for us. He has taken one side, he uses judment and emotions to influence us. "The league actions are disappointing and irresponsable" is a clear example of subjective languaje, as we can see, the authors point of view is against the league.
A consulting firm is often involved in helping businesses operate more efficiently.
The correct answer is B. Sabotage.
Explanation
Sabotage is a term to refer to the destruction, damage, or negative alteration carried out internally by an employee or an official in a company or institution. In government institutions, sabotage refers to intelligence or internal espionage to reveal data to other institutions. According to the above, the word that has a negative connotation in the fragment is Sabotage; the correct answer is B.
