1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mina [271]
2 years ago
8

Should habitual offender laws (3-Strikes laws), be used as a sentencing option in US Courts? Are they effective at reducing crim

e?
Law
1 answer:
dalvyx [7]2 years ago
7 0
Three strikes law must reduce recidivism through incapacitation and deterrence of crime
You might be interested in
During the first few presidential elections, how were vice presidents selected?
masha68 [24]
C. The 2nd place vote getter



The runner up for the position of Vice President. This is in the federalist era by the way
4 0
3 years ago
The length of a rectangle is 5 feet less twice the width. The perimeter is 50 feet
andrew11 [14]
What’s the question?
5 0
3 years ago
The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment sought to determine the relative deterrent effects of arrest, mediation, and separa
AlexFokin [52]

Answer:

One of the findings was that it was possible to see that prisons were able to reduce the level of violence against women.

Explanation:

The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment sought to stipulate which punishment was most effective in decreasing cases of domestic violence. For this, they will observe the effects of arrests, mediations and separations in incidents of domestic violence, applied to a group of offenders convicted of this type of crime. During the evaluation of the results, it was observed that prisons were more effective in decreasing the rate of repeated domestic violence against women, as offenders who were arrested had the lowest rate of recidivism of domestic violence, in contrast to other punishments.

4 0
3 years ago
Summarize one landmark supreme court case related to the investigation stage.
Vadim26 [7]
Stop and Frisk laws and reasonable doubt
3 0
3 years ago
Which of these are true of super political action committees, but not of PACs? Select TWO answers.
Rufina [12.5K]

Answer:

Super PACs enable unlimited donations.

Super PACs have more government restrictions.

Explanation:

Super Political Action Committee are those group of committee that are heading other sub committee of any given political group. They are like the management body of the different arms and committees of that political body which they represent. While PAC are the group that has direct contact with the voters and citizens during any given political campaigns.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In order for matter to recycle and return in the food chain shown here
    12·1 answer
  • How do you kill someone with out killing them
    8·2 answers
  • Burglary is the unlawful entry into a building to commit a crime. How is this crime
    15·1 answer
  • What is habeas corpus please help due tommorrow
    11·1 answer
  • Kahulugan nang mambabatas
    11·2 answers
  • The police-community relations movement (PCR) developed out of the:
    10·2 answers
  • List 6 penalties for driving under the influence
    9·1 answer
  • Who presides over any impeachment trial of the president of the united states
    10·1 answer
  • In cases were individuals have duties toward others, failure to act can be prohibited and made punishable in criminal court.
    5·1 answer
  • Assume you are a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. A nominee for the Supreme Court has an excellent reputation as a lawy
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!