Answer: $275,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Annual net income = $22,000
Capitalization rate = 8%
Value of the property = ?
Capitalization rate = 
8% = 
Value of the property = 
= $275,000
On Monday and Tuesday, the process appears to be out of control.
<u>Explanation</u>:
- There are five days Monday, Tuesday,Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. Monday and Tuesday have weight up to 21. Wednesday weights up to 21.
- Thursday and Friday weigh up to 20. Except for Monday and Tuesday, all the days have packaged up to the value of 21. So Monday and Tuesday are the days that appear to be out of control.
- On checking the package for each day he came to know that Monday and Tuesday have process out of control.
Explanation:
The technology will grow until 2022, and our job will have definitely improved by making it easier to communicate to our customers and by providing managers with jobs that managers have been paid less.
The job market for management workers has risen since the economic downturn in the 2008-2009 recessions.
This is anticipated to increase, as administrative workers work in economic sectors, such as education, social services, legal aid, health care and finance, that are growing and creating new jobs. The employers are looking to reoccupy these positions with so many jobs lost during the crisis and the recent recovery in the economy.
Answer:
Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury.
Explanation:
The above question is incomplete as there are several answer options which are listed below;
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury as long as Lexi was in the room when she got
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury
• Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury
• Lexi can hold the manufacturer liable for Jill's injury.
The above answer - Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury, is true according to the rule of privity of contract. The rule states that a person who is not a party to a contract does not have right to sue or be sued and to enforce the obligations arising from the contract, unlike a person who is a party to the contract.
With regards to the above scenario, Lexi, who buys a food processor is the party to the contract here, hence can sue and be sued in case of any injury suffered by her, however, Jill whom food processor was loaned to, is the third party here, hence not covered by the rule of privity of contract.
