Answer:
The field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of Dr. Original's original research. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.
Explanation:
It is acceptable for scientific research to be replicated by different researchers. However, the publication of a scientific research classified as a replica must contain credits to the original research, otherwise it will be considered plagiarism.
In this case, in relation to the example shown in the question above, we can say that the field of psychology would see Dr. Copycat's research as a replica of the original research, carried out by Dr. Original. In that case, Dr. Copycat's experiment would be considered honest if, during publication, credits were provided for Dr. Original's research.
The answer is b how bird choose were to build there nest
Answer:
Far western of nepal like kanchanpur, doti, bajang
<span>Apparently, the supporters of the
exclusionary rule argue that the rule is the one effective deterrent against
police misconduct because according to them, the rule must be preserved in
order to guarantee that the constitutional rights are must be honored.
Moreover, in contrast to those who want to see the exclusionary rule abolished
argue that the treat of civil lawsuits should be enough to deter police
misconduct because they believed that the rule costs are too much and it
operates to precent juries from considering highly relevant evident in which it
sometimes operated to allow the guilty to go free. </span>
