Answer:
a. No, because Shelby made a mistake about the dog's value, not a mistake about a material fact.
Explanation:
Peggy made an offer to sell the dog for $800, they didn't discuss the dog's ancestry and Shelby wrongly assumed the dog was from champion lines and agreed to buy the dog for $800.
Based on further investigations, she discovered the dog was worth just $200.
She cannot rescind the contract because she wrongly assumed the dog's value not an error about à material fact. Peggy sold the dog at her own rates and Shelby bought the dog while wrongly assuming the value, so she cannot cancel the contract based on that.
Answer:
a. What is the after state taxes profit in the state with the 10% tax rate?
after state tax profit = $1,015,000 x (1 - state tax rate) = $1,015,000 x 0.90 = $913,500
b. What is the after state taxes profit in the state with the 2% tax rate?
after state tax profit = $960,000 x (1 - state tax rate) = $960,000 x 0.98 = $940,800
Unlike federal corporate taxes which apply to all US corporations regardless of where they operate, state corporate taxes vary a lot depending on the state. Some states do not collect any tax at all (6 states) while others charge taxes that vary from 2.5% to 12%.
<span>The standard of proof to find a defendant who has been charged with a crime guilty is beyond a reasonable doubt. This means Sun-Hi can only be found guilty by jurors after all the evidence is given and all the the facts and information about the case has been given as well. The jurors must be convinced that Sun-Hi is guilty of the crime by using the evidence. This term creates a standard for all courts in the U.S. to follow, which ensures the court process is done right.</span>
Answer:
C. groupthink
Explanation:
According to my research on in the field of psychology, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this scenario illustrates the concept of groupthink. This is a psychological phenomenon which states that the desire for maintaining a cooperative and harmonious nature within a group leads individuals in that group to behave irrationally leading to bad decision-making choices. Which is what is happening in this scenario since Mikhail isn't voicing her opinion in order to maintain the same group dynamic.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
I think because in a mutual they both gain and invest but on their own its too much
