Answer:
criminal investigation and court procedures
Explanation:
The common factor between the Mapp vs Ohio, Miranda vs Arizona and Gideon vs Wainwright was that they were all criminal investigation and court procedures.
In the Miranda vs Arizona case, the court ruled that the incriminating statements made by the accused were only admissible in court if the police informed the suspect of his Miranda rights first.
In the Mapp vs Ohio case, the court ruled that evidence obtained through violation of the Fourth Amendment which has to do with unlawful searches and seizures were not admissible in court.
During the Gideon vs Wainwright case, the court ruled that the states were bound by the Sixth Amendment to produce a lawyer for an accused if he cannot afford one.
Answer:
The answer to your question is B.
Title IX
Title IX bans educational institutions that receive federal funding from discriminating against individuals based on their sex. The wording of the original legislation was: "<span>No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."</span>
Title IX was passed in 1972 as part of other legislation pertaining to education. It followed on the heels of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. One of the initial applications of Title IX law was that equality of opportunity needed to be maintained in college athletics. Since then, it has been applied to deal with sexual harassment and sexual violence on college campuses as well.
I believe it is D but I could be wrong...
since the legislative branch consists of the US congress, and the congress can override a veto by passing the act by a two-thirds vote in both the Senate and the House.
