It is true that right-to-work laws stipulate that a person cannot be denied employment because of membership or non-membership in a labor union or other labor organization.
The concept of the right to work is that people have a human right to work or engage in productive employment and should not be denied that right. The right to work is recognized in international human rights law through its inclusion in the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, where the right to work emphasizes economic, social, and cultural development.
The right to work was also enshrined as a fundamental right of citizens in the Soviet Union's constitution. The Human Rights Measurement Initiative assesses countries' right to work based on their level of income.
Learn more about right to work here:
brainly.com/question/14711960
#SPJ4
Hello There!
Your answer would be <u>C). A tortious act may also be a criminal act.</u>
The reason why C would be your answer is because a tortious act is something that harms someone in any way. The reason why it "may" be a criminal act is because determine if the tortious act is a criminal act really depends on the scenario that is occurring. For example, someone could cause a tortious act in a way of self defense, this scenario would be debatable because the person that committed the tortious act had a valid reason in doing so, and that was protecting themselves. But, if a person was to cause a tortious act by hurting someone to steal from them, then that would definitely be a criminal act because they are performing dangerous things to someone else, and the person could file a lawsuit against it.
Let's dive into why the other answer choices are incorrect. We can use the old fashion process of elimination:
Answer choice "A). A tortious act is always a criminal act" is incorrect because it is not always a criminal act, it depends on the scenario it's in. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer choice "B). A criminal act is always a tortious act" is incorrect because there are MANY criminal acts that doesn't harm anyone, for example, tax evasion (not paying taxes) is a criminal act, but does not cause any harm to anyone. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer choice "D). A tortious act is the same as a contract dispute" is incorrect because harming someone is not the same as not doing what a contract says. A contact dispute is when someone that's part of a contract did not do a duty that the contract says that they're suppose to do, and that usually doesn't have to be any harm to anyone. That would not be the same as a tortious act, harming someone. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
You can only be eligible for OSAP if you don't have enough money from other sources to cover your college or university expenses. The income that you report to OSAP generally needs to match what you reported to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) when you filed your taxes.
Answer:
d. both the income and substitution effects encourage the consumer to purchase less of the good.
Explanation:
The income effect is the effect on the income when there are price changes. When the price increases, people can buy less products with the same income which means that the consumer will be encouraged to purchase less goods.
The substitution effect says that an increase in the price of a product will make customers to buy other similar products which will make them to purchase less of the good with the higher price.
I'd say fasle. many people now and days change jobs bc they arent what they thought it would be
