All living things have cells, they reproduce, they more in some king of
way/ grow, and they use energy from some sort of water and food.
Answer: D
Explanation:
During the process of photosynthesis the plant would use carbon dioxide, sunlight and water in order to produce and release sugar and oxygen back into the air.
It is true that it is possible for a population to not evolve for a while.
There is something called the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, which characterizes the distributions of genotype frequencies in populations that are not evolving.
There are 5 Hardy-Weinberg assumptions:
- no mutation
- random mating
- no gene flow
- infinite population size
- and no selection (natural nor forced).
You can see that some of these are kinda extreme and really hard to get, but with approximations, we can work.
For example, instead of an "infinite population size" we have enough with a really large population, such that genetic drift is negligible.
Concluding, yes, it is possible (but really difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while (at least, in nature), as long as the 5 assumptions above are met.
If you want to learn more, you can read:
brainly.com/question/19431143
A because the dna paternity test is not genetically modified information that something that deals with correlation ppl and other animals
