Answer:
protest or defy
Explanation:
Since the school has a No logo policy, wearing a shirt that goes against the policy would be an act of protest or defiance. Jackie knows she's wearing a shirt with a corporate logo and she knows about the school's policy. Therefore, her intentionally going against the policy is protesting or defying the policy.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer: B. He changes the verbs to present tense.
Explanation:
In the adaptation, the biggest difference made was how he worded it to make it sound like it was happening in present tense.
Details were changed but not enough for it to be the main reason that the story felt like it was happening live so C. and D. are wrong.
The perspective was already in first person to begin with so A. is wrong as well.
The only option left is B. and we can see that he does change the story to be in present tense which is a good explanation as to how the story sounded like it was happening live.
I hope this helps!
I would say that I am against the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas.
For one fires can very easily get out of hand, especially if the area is dry at the time that the fire is started. When and if the fire gets out of hand it would do way more harm than good to the wild life in the area.
The answer is me. Would you like Fred and me to leave for lunch now? Because if you were to say this without Fred you would say, "Would you like me to leave for lunch now" rather than, "Would you like myself to leave for lunch now". So your correct answer is me. Saying myself sounds awkward and is not the correct terminology for this phrase.
I hope this helps!
