Reference is the long term for ref
The prepositions in the sentence are;
A preposition is a part of speech that is typically used before a noun phrase, a noun, or pronoun to indicate a direction, location, or duration of something. They also show the relationship between words in a sentence. In the sentence given above, the prepositions are; through, about, and for.
'Through' indicates the way critical thinking can be used to obtain a positive effect. 'About' is another preposition that means 'concerning' or 'regarding'. 'For' is the third preposition that indicates the end result of something.
Learn more about prepositions here:
brainly.com/question/10595540
Answer:
Finally enabled scholars to unlock the Egyptian past.
Explanation:
<em>The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone</em> by James Giblin provided an informative text on the Rosetta Stone that was discovered by researchers. This stone led to an insight into the language and history of the erstwhile unknown Egyptian life.
In the given passage from the text, the author mentioned how this discovery <em>"finally enabled scholars to unlock the Egyptian past"</em> which has been unavailable till now. It possesses the key to the life and language of the Egyptians, providing access to learn more about them.
Thus, the phrase that supports the view that the people who deciphered the hieroglyphs played an important role was "finally enabled scholars to unlock the Egyptian past".
The shift in structure from an autobiographical tale to a "bedtime story" or a "fairy tale" increases the personal interest of the reader into the story itself.
The reader starts meeting a family that could be his/hers. The family starts facing some problems or a horrific nightmare. The fairy tale, then, allows the reader to go beyond the borders of the story itself and start picturing himself/herself in the action.
The reader then starts to this how he/she might act? How can the family be protected?....and so on.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
"Students should not play politics" is a tone-deaf argument used by gatekeeping politicians who shut their doors to the struggling youth. For how many years have students complained about their schooling system, only to be turned down due to a lack of funds? When students try to participate in shaping the world, <em>their </em>world, they're treated like children. Students are expected to attend school full-time without being paid or publicly acknowledged. "Students should not play politics" holds little ground and defense for those who use it. What if a student is <em>studying</em> politics? Shouldn't they be able to use their expertise to contribute to political conversations? All inclusivity issues aside, politics will eventually become outdated if the people who run it refuse to listen to students and the younger generations. Most politicians are old and their views are outdated... why not listen to the people next in line? In conclusion, "students should not play politics" is only a restrictive, weak argument at its very core.
