1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleks04 [339]
2 years ago
14

What ended world war world 2?​

History
2 answers:
Marysya12 [62]2 years ago
6 0

Maybe Truman announced Japan's surrender

Please mark as brainliest

Lesechka [4]2 years ago
4 0

Answer: Truman announced Japan's surrender and the end of World War II.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which consequence of the French and Indian War increased support for revolution among British colonists in North
Anarel [89]

Answer:

B)

Great Britain raised taxes on the colonies to pay for the costs of the war.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What three factors are found in the system of checks and balances?
Elden [556K]
In the United States, the three main factors that make up the system of checks and balances would be the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch, and the Judicial Branch, since the goal is to separate these powers so that no single power becomes too powerful. 
6 0
3 years ago
Which statement is LEAST likely to be true of a totalitarian state?
koban [17]
Out of the following statements, the statement which is least likely to be true of a totalitarian state is that education remains in the hands of local communities. 
6 0
2 years ago
Great Britain and France avoided a take over by fascist by
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Great Britain and France avoid a take over by fascists' by restricting freedom of speech.

Explanation:

Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc. , and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.  

How Britain and France avoided fascist revolution inside their own country during rise of fascism in Italy and Germany?

What made Mussolini’s Fascism, and Lenin’s Communism too, was a specific and unique situation, never to be repeated in later history: namely, the presence of enormous masses of disaffected veterans, with recent experience of war at a very high technical level of skill, and angry about the condition of their country. (And of enormous amounts of weapons.) Fascism was not made by speeches or by money, but by tens of thousands of men gathering in armed bands to beat up enemies. And that being the case, what happened to the similar masses of veterans who came home to France, Britain, and America too, after 1918?

Well, France was exhausted. She had fought with her full strength from day one, whereas Britain had taken time to deploy its whole strength, and America and Italy had only entered the war much later. For five years, every man who could be spared had been at the Front. Her losses were larger in proportion than those of any other great power. And on the positive side, France, like Britain and America, was prosperous. The veterans went home to a country that was comparatively able to receive them, give them a place to be, and not foster any dangerous mass disaffection. This is of course relatively speaking. There will have been anger enough, irritation enough, even some disaffection. But the only real case of violence from below due to disaffection was the riot in Paris that followed the Stavisky affair in early 1934, and that, compared to what took place daily in other countries, was a very bad play of a riot.

ON the other hand, both America and Britain experienced situations that had more than a taste of Fascism, but that failed to develop into freedom-destroying movements. In America, Fascism could have come from above. The last few years of the Wilson administration were horrendous: the Red Scare fanaticized large strata of the population, and the hatred came from the top, from Wilson and his terrible AG Palmer. (Palmer was a Quaker. So was Richard Nixon. Is there a reason why Quakers in politics should prove particularly dangerous?) Hate and fear of “reds” was also the driving force of Italian Fascism; and Wilson and Palmer mobilized it in ways and with goals that Mussolini would have understood. Had Wilson not suffered his famous collapse, he might have been a real danger: he intended to run for a third term in office. And the nationwide spread of the new KKK, well beyond the bounds of the old South, shows that he might have found a pool of willing stormtroopers. Altogether, I think America dodged a bullet the size of a Gatling shot when Wilson collapsed in office.

Britain’s own Blackshirt moment took place in Ireland. Sociologically, culturally, psychologically, the Blacks and Tans were the Blackshirts of Britain - masses of disaffected veterans sent into the streets to harass and terrify political enemies, bullies in non-standard uniforms with a loose relationship with the authorities. Only, their relationship with public opinion developed in an exactly opposite direction. Whereas Italy’s majority, horrified by Socialist violence at home and by Communist brutality abroad, tended increasingly to excuse the Blackshirts and wink at their violence, in Britain - possibly because of the influence of the American media, which were largely against British rule in Ireland - the paramilitary force found itself increasingly isolated from the country’s mainstream, and eventually their evil reputation became an asset to their own enemies and contributed to British acceptance of Irish independence.

Thanks,
Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
Which are reasons why slavery was not as important in the North as in the South?
Flura [38]
The last one is the answer
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which king was excommunicated from the church for arguing with Pope Gregory VII?
    15·2 answers
  • What is judicial review
    10·1 answer
  • Why do citizens have a responsibility to participate in matters of the government?
    10·2 answers
  • Fears about the spread of fascism and communism were a driving force during. a. World War I. c. Spanish Civil War. b. World War
    5·1 answer
  • How did the united states role in the world change in the early 1800s
    11·1 answer
  • 9. Is there anything James I or Charles I could have done to avoid the civil war that occurred in 1648?
    12·1 answer
  • Pottery from a anthropological dig
    11·1 answer
  • The reason the courts of appeals are sometimes called “gatekeepers” is that
    8·2 answers
  • What feature of this time line shows thats it is covering millenia
    9·1 answer
  • Which artist was the first Western artist to have a biography of himself written before he died? This artist was often viewed by
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!