The answer to the questions is: Yes, they do protect people. This is the evidence:
Several studies have found a significant decline in cotinine which is an alkaloid found in tobacco. The decrease was found in both hospitality workers and the general public. For example, since the prohibition of smoking in New York state in 2003 in all indoor areas of workplaces, cotinine in nonsmoking adults decreased by 47.4%. Therefore, we can state that after implementing the law the harm done by secondhand smoke has been dramatically reduced. Studies like this have also been conducted in places like Ireland an England.
The author shows a favorable bias towards Mendel's research and an unfavorable bias towards the opinions of Mendel's scientific peers, by using specific diction such as “deep impact” when referring to Mendel's work and “very little understanding” when expressing the beliefs of scientists, as shown in option C.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Diction is very important for an author to be able to express their thoughts within a text.
- In "The Journey to Acceptance," we can see the efficient use of diction when the author states that Mendel's research had a "profound impact" on the scientific community.
- With this, the author shows a favorable bias to Mendel's research, stating that it is important and its impact was essential.
- On the other hand, the author states that Mendel's peer opinions are not as relevant as they are of “very small understanding.”
- With that, he shows a negative bias, claiming that the opinions of Mendel's peers are not as relevant.
It is important to point out that diction refers to the use of specific words to expose a message through a text.
More information:
brainly.com/question/5308214?referrer=searchResults
Macbeth persuades the murders to kill banquo and his son
Elie Wiesel wasn’t really passionate about religion he thought god as a not careing. To further elaborate he said “if gods a supreme being why are people dying in concentration camps.
The best answer is 3) <span>The
notion that violence and brutality are permissible if they are part of a
long-standing tradition was unsettling and even offensive to many
people.
</span>
Many could not understand how regularly stoning someone to death could become an acceptable part of society. Many found this to be a horror story and argued that it was illogical or sickening to read.
<span />
