An analysis of variance produces SSbetween = 40 and MSbetween = 20. In this analysis, how many treatment conditions are being compared? There are 3 treatments being compared in this analysis of variance from SSbetween = 40 and MSbetween = 20.
Answer: D. Moral relativism
Explanation: The theory of moral relativism helps resolves issues bordering on truth and falsehood. It states that the truth or falsity of moral judgments, or their justification, is not absolute or universal, but is relative to the traditions, convictions, or practices of a group of persons concerned. With respect to justification, it says that judgment may be justified in one society but not in another. Here, no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others, Pratt's, the investors or parents as the case may be.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Game theory looks at the interactions between participants in a competitive game and calculates the best choice for the player.
Dominant strategy is the best option for a player regardless of what the other player is playing.
Nash equilibrium is the best outcome for players where no player has an incentive to change their decisions.
For either firm, the payoff of cutting price is either 6 or 24
For either firm, the payoff of colluding is either 8 or 12
the dominant strategy for both firms is to cut price because it is the best option regardless of what the other firm does as it yields the highest payoffs.
Thus, the Nash equilibrium is to cut price
Answer:
The survey would have happened during the stage of idea screening
Explanation:
The idea screening process involves comparing and contrasting potential new products in order to determine which of the ideas are a perfect fit for the business giving its current resources, strengths , opportunities ,threats or limitations of the business.
At this stage of product development,the over-aching aim is to pick the products could be best invested that yield positive in a short while rather picking all available options that might drain the resources available and not yield commensurate returns.
Answer: Option D $97,282 is correct
Explanation:
Materials Conversion
Units completed and transferred 12200 12200
Ending work in process 4900 2940 =4900*60%
Equivalent units 17100 15140
Materials Conversion Total
Equivalent units 17100 15140
X Cost per Equivalent unit 5.00 4.00
Total costs 85500 60560 146060
Total costs 146060
Less: Cost of beginning work in process 48778 =24012+24766
Cost of units started into production 97282