Answer:
See below
Explanation:
Using this formula
Fixed cost of process B - fixed cost of process A ÷ unit variable cost of process A - unit variable cost of process B
a. Fixed cost = $11,000
Fixed cost = $3,000
Unit variable = $10
Unit variable = $5
Hence:
= ($11,000 - $3,000) / ($10 - $5)
= $7,000 / $5
= $1,400
This means that the larger intermittent process becomes cheaper than the small one by $1,400
b. Fixed cost = $41,000
Fixed cost = $11,000
Unit variable = $5
Unit variable = $1
= ($41,000 - $11,000) / ($5 - $1)
= $30,000 / $4
= $7,500
This means that the repetitive process become cheaper than the larger intermittent process by $7,500
Answer:
To find Earning per share, we can find this by the following formula:
Increase in Earnings Per Share = Net profit of new products / Number of shares
and
Net Profit of new products = 5% * $4,898,300 = $244,915
Increase in Earnings Per Share = ($244,915) / 1,456,800 = 16.81%
When completing the cost of poor quality analysis, the category under in hard cost under which rework will be considered is : Material for construction. This can include but are not limited to:
- Wood
- Steel
- Glue
- Roofing etc.
<h3>What is
cost of poor quality analysis?</h3>
The cost of poor quality (COPQ) is the expense of supplying low-quality items or services to customers.
In other words, it is the overall financial losses sustained by the firm as a result of doing things incorrectly.
Examples include scrap, rework, repair, and warranty failure.
Learn more about cost of poor quality analysis:
brainly.com/question/16016721
#SPJ4
<span>One must be very careful jumping to conclusions, and especially where there is no behaviorial impact (ie, if his work is really solid, then you have to have much stronger proof of his transgression.) If his work product was poor, or his behvavior in front of the client was a problem, then you have grounds for discussion beyond his breath. </span>