Answer:
dependent
Explanation:
An independent variable refers to the variable that is altered or changed to determine the outcomes on the dependent variable in an empirical experiment. The variable that is evaluated and analyzed in a scientific experiment is a dependent variable. One approach to recognize the dependent variable is to understand that it relies on the independent variable. When investigators implement adjustments to the independent variable after this they assess any alterations to the dependent variable.
As per the question, the creativity of problem solutions alters because of the assigned instruction or a no-instruction group, which makes it dependent variable
Answer:
The answer would be her experiences of being unhappy is associated with present distress or disability or with a significantly increased risk of suffering death, pain, disability, or an important loss of freedom.
Explanation:
The DSM-IV-TR was organized into a five-part axial system. The first axis incorporated clinical disorders. The second axis covered personality disorders and intellectual disabilities. The remaining axes covered medical, psychosocial, environmental, and childhood factors functionally necessary to provide diagnostic criteria for health care assessments.
The DSM-IV-TR characterizes a mental disorder as "a clinically significant behavioral or psychological syndrome or pattern that occurs in an individual which is associated with present distress or disability or with a significant increased risk of suffering.
" It also notes "no definition adequately specifies precise boundaries for the concept of 'mental disorder' different situations call for different definitions". It states "there is no assumption that each category of mental disorder is a completely discrete entity with absolute boundaries dividing it from other mental disorders or from no mental disorder"
It's important because the party that lost the election for president watches the actions of the party in power for mistakes or misuse of power.
Answer:
ADDITIONAL FOOT PATROLS DOES NOT HAVE ANY SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE OVERALL CRIME RATE IN A COMMUNITY.
Explanation: Newark conducted his experiment between the year 1978 to 1979 where he tried to show the relationship between additional foot patrols and crime rate, and perception,he discovered that the overall crime rate in a given community is not significantly affected by increased or additional foot patrols by law enforcement officers but that there is a significant RELATIONSHIP between FOOT PATROL BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS LIKE THE POLICE WITH COMMUNITY RELATION AND PERCEPTION.
<span>The results depend upon how State congressional districts are drawn.</span>
