Answer:
Congress was protecting slaves that were freed after the Civil War
Explanation:
Johnson held that blacks were not qualified to become U.S. citizens and that the measure would “operate in favor of the colored and against the white race.” It was mainly made to protect rights
China used the one-child-policy, in which a family can only have one child
however, it has now expanded to a two-child-policy to address the issue of a growing population of males, and a smaller population of females
hope this helps
By definition, the region of Central Asia is primarily composed of countries that are former part of the Soviet Union territories. These modern independent countries generally include Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and other. In addition to that, regional wars have been taking place in these regions as of late because the countries had struggled for economic independence.
The Supreme Court can declare laws passed by Congress (the House of Representatives and the Senate) to be unconstitutional.
More detail:
Judicial review refers to the courts' ability to review any law to see if it violates any existing law or any statute of a state constitution or the US Constitution. On the federal level, Marbury v. Madison (1803) is considered the landmark case for the Supreme Court asserting its authority of judicial review, to strike down a law as unconstitutional.
Background on the landmark case concerning the Supreme Court's power of judicial review:
It was sort of a roundabout way in which the principle of judicial review was asserted by the Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison. William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia by outgoing president John Adams -- one of a number of such last-minute appointments made by Adams. When Thomas Jefferson came into office as president, he directed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver many of the commission papers for appointees such as Marbury. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court directly to hear his case, as a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had made possible. The Court said that particular provision of the Judiciary Act was in conflict with Article III of the Constitution, and so they could not issue a specific ruling in Marbury's case (which they believe he should have won). Nevertheless, in making their statement about the case, the Court established the principle of judicial review.
