The correct answer is A) a higher chance of reelection.
A potential benefit for a government leader using cost-benefit analysis is a higher chance of reelection.
A correct and useful method of decision-making is CBA or better known as cost-benefit analysis. This method is very simple. You compare your advantages to the disadvantages of the decision. You collect the information at hand and then proceed to make the best decision. In 1840, Julies Dupuit who was an Engineer from France started to use this method successfully. That is why is correct to say that a potential benefit for a government leader using cost-benefit analysis is a higher chance of reelection.
Both R<span>epublicanism and progressiveness believe in the right to Liberty, Freedom and Free Speech.
Both believe in the power of democracy and government by the people. However, both have actually meant different things in different times.
An example is the deep-seated patriotism of Republicanism and the American exceptionalism. On the other hand progressiveness believe in equality among people from all nations and actually support migrations.
</span>
Answer: if two-thirds of both houses override the veto
Explanation: Once the governor receives a bill, he can sign it, veto it, or do nothing. ... If he vetoes the bill, and the Senate and House of Representatives do nothing, the bill “dies. “ If he vetoes the bill and the Senate and the House of Representatives attempt to over-ride the veto, the bill may still become law.
I believe the answer is B.
WHAT TIME PERIOD!?
and if its the 7th century then the answer is:
The Essay
hope this helped!
(: