1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SOVA2 [1]
2 years ago
7

When it is believed that a law treats people differently because of their race, national origin or religion, the courts treat th

e case under the test of
Law
1 answer:
cricket20 [7]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

it is a test of strict scrutiny

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How are your rights supported or limited
Liula [17]

Answer:

supported

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Interest groups (4 points)
arlik [135]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Well, if you're a felon you can't own a gun but yet are civil rights state that all men shall bear arms I guess any arising mili
wariber [46]

Answer:

Technically when you are a felon, you are stripped of your citizenship, and therefore cannot legally own a gun, vote, that sort of thing.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
This refers to the process of a person admitting to guilt in a criminal or civil case, often in the hopes of receiving a lesser
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

guilty plea

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who supports judicial restraint?
balu736 [363]

Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.

<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>

A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.

<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>

They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.

Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Which form of government can make the fastest desisions
    11·1 answer
  • Make a mental list of the responsibilities most adults have in life. Now imagine what would happen if those responsibilities wer
    7·1 answer
  • Definition of 1999 Constitution
    10·1 answer
  • Late one Saturday evening , and Mark decide to a local.convenience store Mark has a loaded shotgun for the robbery , but both me
    14·1 answer
  • The President of Mexico is elected by popular vote for a term of this number of years.
    6·1 answer
  • What are the Essential Parts of a Written Constitution? Briefly explain each​
    8·1 answer
  • Free brainlyest....................
    10·2 answers
  • There Are 2 types of distracted drivers which 2 types of drivers are they
    5·2 answers
  • What is the name of the u. S. Supreme court justice who was appointed to the bench in 1994 and who just announced his forthcomin
    11·1 answer
  • What is the power of the majority?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!