The SCOTUS did not rule that T.L.O’s 4th amendment (searches and seizures) rights had been violated. They ruled that the school administrations search of the bag was reasonable under the circumstances (i.e T.L.O. Being a minor and on school property, meaning that while at school, administration is responsible for the well-being and safety of all students, thus allowing them to search T.L.O’s bag for marijuana). A good way to think of it is that while you’re at school, the administration acts as your parents. Your parents don’t need a warrant to search through your room and neither does the administration if you are on school property. The 4th amendment applies to this case because it protects against unlawful searches and seizures (i.e. searches and seizures that are without a warrant). The constitutional question was whether or not T.L.O. Could be charged with a crime/punished or not because the school administration did not have a warrant. However, because the school administration was acting as a loco parentis (latin term for “in place of the parent”) they did not need a warrant to search her bag. Hope this helped!
Answer:
able to be represented by a straight line on a graph; involving or exhibiting directly proportional change in two related quantities.
Explanation:
Answer:
True/cooperative drivers would likely be the most correct one, if that's what you're asking.
Explanation:
Answer:
True!
Explanation:
The phrase “the Rule of Law” has to be distinguished from the phrase “a rule of law”. The
latter phrase is used to designate some particular legal rule like the rule against perpetuates.
or the rule that says we have to file our taxes by a certain date.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Council of Economic Advisers, an agency within the Executive Office of the President, is charged with providing the President objective economic advice on the formulation of both domestic and international economic policy.
