Beak-even point (BEP) in business is the point at which total cost and total revenue are equal. There is no net gain or loss, and one has "broken even", though opportunity costs have been paid and capital has received the risk-adjusted, expected return.
The formula for break-even is given by:
BEP=(Fixed Costs)/(Sales Price per Unit-Variable Cost per Unit)
From the above formula we can conclude that:
When Fixed costs reduces, the BEP decreases. Therefore the answer is [a]
Answer:
The answer is 14%
Explanation:
Formula for Future value (FV) FV = PV (1+ni)
Whereas FV= Future value, PV = present value, n= number of years, i= TVOM in percentage
Rearranging the formula for i
i = (FV/PV)-1
So, i = (5,700/5,000)-1
i = 1.14-1
i = 0.14
i = 14%
(0.14x100=14%)
The answer that is being described above is the broad emphasis. This are used by other artists in which they used this method when they try to pin point about something and tries to express them in their artwork without any exact rule or part to place the artwork that is being done. It is mostly used to point out the entire artwork that the artist is trying top point out or give the message.
Answer:
1.Parties [Identify the plaintiff and the defendant] - The plaintiff is Henry Keller of H.K.Enterprises and the defendant is Bank of Nigeria and Nigerian individuals Central Bank of Nigeria, Paul Ogwuma, ?Alhaji Rasheed, Alhaji M.A. Sadiq.
2.Facts [Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case] - The case was filed by Keller against the defendants in United States. The case was filed under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) as the plaintiff found himself a victim of fraud and financial scam.The scam occured when one of the defendants approached the plaintiff who was the sales representative of medical equipments for granting him the distribution rights for Nigeria. The expected amount of money was not transferred in the account of plaintiff inspite of his attempts of meeting the requirements of the defendants. The defendants acted on the behalf of Central Bank of Nigeria and as Nigerian individuals.
3.Procedure [Who brought the appeal? What was the outcome in the lower court(s)?] - The appeal was filed by the defendants Central Bank of Nigeria,?Paul Ogwuma, Alhaji Rasheed, Alhaji M.A. Sadiq. The lower court gave the decision that the claims of fraud and misrepresentation do not hold against the defendants as the plaintiff entered into an arrangement with them which is not legal and as per the rules. However the lower court ruled that immunity cannot be given under FSIA to the defendants as the commercial activity is an exception and claims for violation of RICO are applicable on them.
4. Issue [Note the central question or questions on which the case turns] - The case turns on the appeal of defendants to be granted immunity under Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. The ruling indicated that the defendants have sovereign authority. Also, the commercial activity clause did not apply in this case as the activity was not done in United States and did not meet the legal standards of a commercial activity.
5.Explain the applicable law(s). - Applicable laws are Common law fraud, violations of RICO(Rackteer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act), Misrepresentation.
6.Holding [How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?] - The court resolved the issue by giving a decision in the favor of defendants by ruling that immunity is given to Foreign nationals under FSIA and dismissed any claims filed against them under RICO.
7.Reasoning [Explain the logic that supported the court's decision] - The logic supporting the court's decision is that the arrangement between the plaintiff and defendants including the signed contract was not as per the laws and rules and was not legally compliant. Moreover the commercial activity was out of bounds for United states so the exception to FISA is not applicable. The defendants claimed that they did not enter into the contract with the plaintiff.
Explanation:
Answer:
$54,000
Explanation:
The opportunity cost is that cost which can be given the benefit out of the given options. In another way, it would be select the best alternative option which gives you the best results or benefits.
In the given case, Allison earns $54,000 in her first year of employment and if she works with her father she earns an annual salary of $38,000. So, the opportunity cost, in this case, would be $54,000
