The best way is: B. flat, so that the north pole of the magnets on the train point up and the north poles of the magnets on the track point down.
<h3>What is the law of magnetism?</h3>
The law of magnetism states that the like poles of a magnet repel one another while unlike (different) poles attract each other. Thus, two north (N) poles of a magnet would repel one another while a north (N) and south (S) would attract each other.
Based on the law of magnetism, the best way to arrange the magnets on the train and on the track, so as to allow the model train levitate is flat, as this would make the north (N) pole of the magnets on the train point up and the north (N) poles of the magnets on the track point down.
Read more on law of magnetism here: brainly.com/question/14945557
#SPJ1
<u>Complete Question:</u>
Jolie builds a model of a maglev train. She uses disc magnets to levitate the train. A disc magnet has its north and south poles on its faces, as shown.
What is the best way to arrange the magnets on the train and on the track so that the model train levitates?
Answer:
Villa of Green Happiness.
Explanation:
Answer:
If coal consumption remained constant, coal production Stayed the same
The strategy that is likely to result in the greatest increase in the San Joaquin kit fox population is strategy one.
<h3>Which change is said to be responsible for the decline of the kit fox population A?</h3>
Habitat destruction and fragmentation is known to be the factor that has led to and has been identified as the most vital cause of the kit fox's decline and it is one that has threatens the species' consistent viability.
So, the human intervention that would most likely protect and keep the kit fox populations is through the Introduction of a species that can be able to act as the new kit fox food source.
Hence, The strategy that is likely to result in the greatest increase in the San Joaquin kit fox population is strategy one.
Learn more about fox population from
brainly.com/question/27948222
#SPJ1
Hamilton thinks judges should be appointed permanently rather than on a periodic basis because periodic appointments would destroy a judge’s independence.
Alexander Hamilton was an American revolutionary. He was also a statesman and the Founding Father of the United States. He played a key role in promotion and interpretation of the constitution.
Permanent appointments would help to regulate more as well ensure greater independence of the judge.
Periodic appointment on the other hand would destroy a judge independence as he/she can be transferred or impeached anytime that fosters insecurity and lack of motivation to work.
Thus, permanent appointments is the only option.
To learn more about judges here
brainly.com/question/1059156
#SPJ4
