All categories

2 years ago

Find the surface area of the prism below.

Mathematics

1 answer:

CaHeK987 [17]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

the surface area of the prism = 378 cm³

Step-by-step explanation:

Let S be the surface area of the prism

B be the base of the prism

h be the height of the prism

T be the lateral surface area of the prism

_______

Formula

S = 2B + T

_________

$\begin{aligned}B &=\frac{9 \times 12}{2} \\&=54\end{aligned}$

$\begin{aligned}T &=7,5 \times(9+12+15) \\&=270\end{aligned}$

$\begin{aligned}S &=2 B+T \\&=2 \times(54)+270 \\&=378\end{aligned}$

You might be interested in

Q6. Yesterday Aaron ran 5 km. This morning Aaron ran 4 km. How far did Aaron run altogether?

laiz [17]

Answer:

9 km

Step-by-step explanation:

you add the distance Aaron ran

6 0

3 years ago

15 POINTS PLEASE HELP

myrzilka [38]

$800
That is the answer

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A culinary club earns $1190 from a dinner service. They sold 34 adult meals and 51 student meals. an adult meal costs twice as m

Murrr4er [49]

59 gdgdksgfjjjkkkkjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In a completely randomized experimental design, three brands of paper towels were tested for their ability to absorb water. Equa

arlik [135]

Answer:

Yes. At this significance level, there is evidence to support the claim that there is a difference in the ability of the brands to absorb water.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete:

The significance level is 0.05.

The data is:

Brand X: 91, 100, 88, 89

Brand Y: 99, 96, 94, 99

Brand Z: 83, 88, 89, 76

We have to check if there is a significant difference between the absorbency rating of each brand.

Null hypothesis: all means are equal

$H_0:\mu_x=\mu_y=\mu_z$

Alternative hypothesis: the means are not equal

$H_a: \mu_x\neq\mu_y\neq\mu_z$

We have to apply a one-way ANOVA

We start by calculating the standard deviation for each brand:

$s_x^2=30,\,\,s_y^2=6,\,\,s_z^2=35.33$

Then, we calculate the mean standard error (MSE):

$MSE=(\sum s_i^2)/a=(30+6+35.33)/3=71.33/3=23.78$

Now, we calculate the mean square between (MSB), but we previously have to know the sample means and the mean of the sample means:

$M_x=92,\,\,M_y=97,\,\,M_z=84\\\\M=(92+97+84)/3=91$

The MSB is then:

$s^2=\dfrac{\sum(M_i-M)^2}{N-1}\\\\\\s^2=\dfrac{(92-91)^2+(97-91)^2+(84-91)^2}{3-1}\\\\\\s^2=\dfrac{1+36+49}{2}=\dfrac{86}{2}=43\\\\\\\\MSB=ns^2=4*43=172$

Now we calculate the F statistic as:

$F=MSB/MSE=172/23.78=7.23$

The degrees of freedom of the numerator are:

$dfn=a-1=3-1=2$

The degrees of freedom of the denominator are:

$dfd=N-a=3*4-3=12-3=9$

The P-value of F=7.23, dfn=2 and dfd=9 is:

$P-value=P(F>7.23)=0.01342$

As the P-value (0.013) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected.

There is evidence to support the claim that there is a difference in the ability of the brands to absorb water.

3 0

3 years ago

Need help with number 2 ASAP! Try to show work! Thank you!!!

timofeeve [1]

C is the answer :) :)

4 0

3 years ago