Answer:
We have always had stories. They were first told orally as fairy tales, folklore, and epic poems, and were eventually written down. And for as long as we have had stories, we’ve had literature. Stories are usually considered literature when they have long-lasting artistic or social value. Epic poems like The Odyssey or novels like To Kill a Mockingbird are considered literature because they have deeper meanings that go beyond the story. Both stories are meant to do more than just amuse the reader. A pop novel, like a James Patterson book you can buy at the airport, would not traditionally be considered literature because it is not meant to do much more than entertain the reader.
As we’ve transitioned from hearing stories to reading them, our ideas have changed about what kinds of stories have merit. We have always made a point to pass on the stories we value to next generation, regardless of their form. Therefore, it should not be so outrageous to declare that a new form of literature has been forged and needs to be passed on: television shows.
Television shows can be as complex as novels and can provide students with opportunities to learn that novels do not. Yet, there are legitimate concerns about using classroom time to dissect1 television. One issue is that complex television shows tend to have adult or graphic themes not suitable for the classroom. Another concern involves how much time students spend on television. Plenty of students already watch and discuss television in their own time, so is television needed in the classroom, too? Finally, the written word teaches cognitive2 skills that television cannot.
Answer:
It means that you and what it is you were doing is wrong so to go back and try again
Explanation:
Like if you have a project about fish and you say they can live outside of water your teacher might say go back to the drawing board and try again
10 ÷ 5 = x
Think of it like this, if 5 lots of x fit into 10,
5x = 10
We divide both sides by 5 to get x
5/5 = x
10 ÷ 5 = x
A logical fallacy has to do with the faulty conclusion which is gotten when making an argument that is invalid based on the available facts and premise.
There are different types of fallacy and some of them include:
- Straw man fallacy
- Fallacy of hasty generalisation
- Appeal to force
- False dilemma
- Faulty analogy, etc
The main aim of a logical fallacy is to give a faulty conclusion that is not logical at all but misleading and incorrect on careful observation.
Please note that your question is incomplete so I gave you a general overview to help you get a better understanding of the concept.
Read more about logical fallacy here:
brainly.com/question/4255659
