Answer:
It takes into account people's overlapping identities and experiences to understand the complexity of the prejudices they face.
In other words, the affirmative intersectional theory that people are often disadvantaged by multiple sources of oppression: their race, class, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, and other markers of identity. Intersectionality recognizes that identity markers (eg, "feminine" and "black") do not exist identified by each other, and each of the information to the others, often creating a complex convergence of oppression.
Explanation:
Today, intersectionality is considered crucial for social equity work. Activists and community organizations are asking for and participating in more dynamic conversations about differences in experience between people with different overlapping identities. Without an intersectional lens, events and movements that aim to address injustice toward one group can end up perpetuating systems of inequities towards other groups. Intersectionality fully informs YW Boston's work, by encouraging nuanced conversations about inequality in Boston. It illuminates us about health disparities among women of color, provides avenues for our youth leaders to understand identity, and is crucial to the advocacy work we support.
Truthfully speaking there is none. There are plenty of "underprivileged"
people who have risen to success based on their determination. Everyone
has equal access to information because information is free. The only
reason someone would commit a crime is if they were brought up into
believing that that was what was expected of them from society due to
their geographical location, income, color, religion, etc. Those who are
determined to push past the narrative prove that "unequal access to
basic services" and crime are not directly related. Anyone who tells you
otherwise wishes you to remain a slave to the system because they
believe that being poor is where you belong and where you should stay.
This might be late but here is an explanation, the New Deal only helped with political agendas. It could not end the Great Depression.
Answer:
The answer is theodicy.
Explanation:
Theodicy refers to a branch of philosophy that questions the existence of evil in the presence of an all-powerful God.
Many philosopher's along history have dealt with this problem, and one of the first to do so was Epicurus, who claimed that a God that could but didn't want to stop evil shouldn't even be called a God.
