Answer:
The interpretation of the discussion is set out somewhere throughout the explanation segment below.
Explanation:
- Throughout Hamlet, another good soliloquy which begins with "Whether or not it should be-that has been the query or concern" is an illustration of such a personality physiological occurrence for the central protagonist of Hamlet.
- This same author provides Hamlet a feeling of optimism as well as dramatic tension throughout internal processes by constructing hypothetical strategies for the viewing public.
Tsar Nicholas II was the eldest son of the tsarevitch Aleksandr Aleksandrovic.
The correct option is:
Tsar Nicholas II took over command of the army during WWI, he left in charge of the government is:
Tsarina Alexandra
<h3 /><h3>Tsar Nicholas II</h3><h3 />
- Rasputin reached the height of his power at the Russian court after 1915.
- During World War I, Nicholas II took command of his army and proceeded to the front lines.
- He put Alexandra in charge of Russia's internal affairs, while Rasputin served as her personal advisor.
Thus option (b) Tsarina Alexandra is correct.
To know more about Tsar Nicholas II, visit here:
brainly.com/question/16052060
Answer:
It is a concept of "unity without uniformity and diversity without fragmentation" that shifts focus from unity based on a mere tolerance of physical, cultural, linguistic, social, religious, political, ideological and/or psychological differences towards a more complex unity based on an understanding that difference.
please give me brainliest
1) False, it cannot provide us with nearly 100 years worth of oil.
2) True, Coal has no advantage over other energy sources.
3) true! it can be described as chain reaction
4) true! each country has their own way of categorizing
5) false!
6) true!
1. To get raw materials and sell goods...
<span>2. he tried to conquer other lands instead of promoting individual freedom... </span>
<span>3. caused small kingdoms to join together...Italy and Germany being the best example
100% :) </span>
