Along the decriminalization of Christian worship during the rule of emperor Constantine, most of the territory of the Empire had Christian areas; amongst them, present Italy and Greece.
The site of the temple mount in Jerusalem is important to Judaism and Islam faith. Thus the correct answer is B and C.
<h3>Why temple Mount is so important?</h3>
The temple mount is important because it is believed that the presence of God is identified over there. Judaism turns towards it when they pray because they believe it to be the location where God's presence manifested itself more than any other location.
Judaism considers the Temple Mount site to be holy because they believe Abraham offered up his own son, Isaac, there as a sacrifice.
Muslims respect the Temple Mount as well since it is the third-most significant Islamic holy site, behind Mecca and Medina. Abraham was ready to sacrifice his own son Ishmael according to the Quran.
Therefore, options B and C Judaism and Islam are the correct options.
Learn more about temple Mount, here:
brainly.com/question/4983848
#SPJ1
Q1. Why would Spanish not have used the pilogues as much as the French?
C. The Spanish were focused on different geographic direction
Q2. What was the name of the group President Jackson established to map reservation areas in Oklahoma for certain tribes?
D. Reconstruction Commission.
Because belonging to the church (being a church official such as a priest or a bishop) esentially meant you were given education (not common or at all present in those times) and a good position with a pay. You also exerted a lot of power in your local or regional community as church officials were considered to have been influential figures in medieval ages.
The correct answer is Keynes.
Keynes supported free markets but as long as these were regulated by state intervention in order to soften the peaks and troughs in the business cycle. Therefore, in his opinion, the three economic questions (what to produce, how and for whom) should be answered by the economic agents in the markets, but always under the supervision of the state.
Smith was an advocate of free markets and of supressing state interventionism. On the other hand, Marx was in favour of massive intervention of the state because he considered markets to produce un unfair distribution of wealth in the states, where the richer ones exploited the poor.
