Answer:
rotate text is the correct answer
Answer:
In footnotes, information is separated by commas, while in the bibliography, it is separated by periods.
In footnotes, the author's first name is listed first, while in the bibliography, the author's last name is listed first.
The titles of books and journals are put in italics.
The titles of articles are put in quotation marks.
All key words in titles are capitalized.
Explanation:
Answer:
"Case-Based Reasoning" is the answer for the above question.
Explanation:
- Case-Based Reasoning is a process of decision-making theory in which the new problems were solved based on the previously solved problem.
- It is used in artificial intelligence and robots. This helps to make any AI and robots to do the work and take decisions on its own.
- The theory is used to make any computer that behaves like humans. It can take decisions like a human.
- The above question asked about the method by which the new problem is solved on behalf of the old problem. Hence the answer is "Case-Based Reasoning".
The answer is : What the field names will be. This <span>is not critical when you are first designing a database. </span>
A belief is an attitude that something is the case, or that some proposition about the world is true.[1] In epistemology, philosophers use the term "belief" to refer to attitudes about the world which can be either true or false.[2] To believe something is to take it to be true; for instance, to believe that snow is white is comparable to accepting the truth of the proposition "snow is white". However, holding a belief does not require active introspection. For example, few carefully consider whether or not the sun will rise tomorrow, simply assuming that it will. Moreover, beliefs need not be occurrent (e.g. a person actively thinking "snow is white"), but can instead be dispositional (e.g. a person who if asked about the color of snow would assert "snow is white").[2]
There are various different ways that contemporary philosophers have tried to describe beliefs, including as representations of ways that the world could be (Jerry Fodor), as dispositions to act as if certain things are true (Roderick Chisholm), as interpretive schemes for making sense of someone's actions (Daniel Dennett and Donald Davidson), or as mental states that fill a particular function (Hilary Putnam).[2] Some have also attempted to offer significant revisions to our notion of belief, including eliminativists about belief who argue that there is no phenomenon in the natural world which corresponds to our folk psychological concept of belief (Paul Churchland) and formal epistemologists who aim to replace our bivalent notion of belief ("either we have a belief or we don't have a belief") with the more permissive, probabilistic notion of credence ("there is an entire spectrum of degrees of belief, not a simple dichotomy between belief and non-belief").[2][3]
Beliefs are the subject of various important philosophical debates. Notable examples include: "What is the rational way to revise one's beliefs when presented with various sorts of evidence?"; "Is the content of our beliefs entirely determined by our mental states, or do the relevant facts have any bearing on our beliefs (e.g. if I believe that I'm holding a glass of water, is the non-mental fact that water is H2O part of the content of that belief)?"; "How fine-grained or coarse-grained are our beliefs?"; and "Must it be possible for a belief to be expressible in language, or are there non-linguistic beliefs?".[2]
