Not completely sure, but maybe C.?
Hi
Please find all answers in attached file.
Hope they help!
OPTIONS:
a. When there are just two other people at the party.
b. When everyone is wearing a nametag.
c. When there are more than 50 people attending the same party.
d. When the need for help from the person who is having a heart attack is very clear
Answer:
c. When there are more than 50 people attending the same party.
Explanation:
Bystander effect is a term used in social psychology to describe the tendency of an individual to intervene in the event of an emergency to offer help to the person needing it, when others are present at the scene of the emergency.
In the case of an emergency just like the scenario stated in the question, where someone develops a heart attack at a dance party, if the party has more people, the slimmer the chance of the person getting help from any of the 50 people at the party, as the presence of others would tend to discourage the any individual from attempting to help the victim having the heart attack.
The situation that would more likely show the bystander intervention effect is <em>"c. When there are more than 50 people attending the same party."</em>
Incomplete dominance is when one allele is not completely dominant over the other (blend in), and codominance is when both alleles affect the phenotype(appearance)
Example of incomplete dominance: a red flower mates with a with flower and makes an pink offspring
Example of codominance: a brown cow mates with a with cow and the offspring being with and brown polkadots
