Answer:
The best example of legal pluralism is that Indian litigants could have their cases tried in local or British courts, with their own legal customs applied.
Explanation:
Legal pluralism is a situation in which a territory has several different legal orders and legal systems, often based on the fact that society consists of several social groups with different cultures and traditions or that a state territory has shared sovereignty within, therefore having two nations applying their respective laws. In a situation where there is legal pluralism, the individual group affiliation will determine which legal order the person's case belongs to, or also which legal system the case is processed in. Legal pluralism is in contrast to legal centralism, which is characterized by a common legal order in a territory.
<span>Those who want a weak/subordinate and those who want a stronger/independent/co-equal executive branch</span>
The Two Houses of Congress. Congress is divided into two chambers, the Senate and the House of Representatives.
They losf power do to the people growing unhappy with the state of the country
Lexington is British
Concord is US
But the US won the whole battle
hope this helps
