The equation that represents the given problem is (n-30) + n = 210. The correct option is the first option (n-30) + n = 210
<h3>Linear equation</h3>
From the question, we are to write an equation for the given problem
From the given information,
n = Tom's weight in pounds
If Jim weighs 30 pounds less than Tom
Then,
Jim weighs (n - 30)
Thus,
The sum of their weight is
(n-30) + n
∴ (n-30) + n = 210
Hence, the equation that represents the given problem is (n-30) + n = 210. The correct option is the first option (n-30) + n = 210
Learn more on Linear equations here: brainly.com/question/4681624
#SPJ1
I can’t see anything on the thing bro
Answer: Statements 1 and 2 shows that the coach blowing the whistle happened first.
Step-by-step explanation: The coach blowing the whistle as the first event can be seen only from statements 1 and 2 only.
From statement 1, "the referee blew the whistle" was followed by "the team ran onto the field."
From statement 2, "before the team ran onto the field" shows clearly that one event took place "BEFORE" the one being reported and the one that occurred before this one was "the referee blew the whistle."
Statement 3 which is "the referee blew the whistle, BUT..." indicates that the whistle was meant to prevent the team from from running onto the field. So if the referee blew the whistle, but the team ran onto the field, it means the whistle blowing was not supposed to make them run onto the field.
Statement 4, which states that "the referee blew the whistle BECAUSE the team ran onto the field" indicates that, the reason for blowing the whistle was because the team ran onto the field which clearly shows that the team ran onto the field first before the referee blew the whistle.
Statement 5, "WHILE the team ran onto the field..." clearly shows that both events took place at the same moment, and so the referee blowing the whistle could not have occurred first.
7.89 is greater than 7.189, 6.03 is equal to 6.030, because that last zero doesn't really change anything it cancels itself out
Answer:A rational number can be written as a fraction of two integers. √23 is irrational because we do not know what the square root of 23 is in terms of integers in a fraction. 104.42 is rational because it can be expressed as 10442/100 . We can express it as this because.
Step-by-step explanation:
