Answer:
The incomplete part of the question is "Using a cap-and-trade system of tradable emission allowances will eliminate half of the sulfur dioxide pollution at a cost of $1 million per year. If the permits are not tradable, what will be the cost of eliminating half of the pollution? If permits cannot be traded, then the cost of the pollution reduction will be $1 million per year." The full question is attched as picture as well
1) Tradable permit system
Then lower MAC firm will abate the all pollution units
Then as MAC1 = $250, MAC2 = $275
Firm 1 = Consolidated electric
Firm 2 = Commonwealth utility
Then 1 will sell all permits to 2, at a price between $250 & $275.
So total cost of abatement of 20 units = MAC1 * 20
= $250 * 20 Unit
= $5,000
2) Non-tradable permits
Total cost = MC1*10 + MC2*10
= $2,500 + $2,750
= $5,250
Sorry but you need to answer this one bud. I would help you if I could but I don't know what makes you, well you. :)
Answer:
$31
Explanation:
Starting from number 25, number 26 is a possibility, but then you get number 31 which is larger. Then the following numbers all show a possible combination:
<u>
N° 9's 5's
</u>
25 0 5
26
27 3 0
28 2 2
29 1 4
30 0 6
31 - -
32 3 1
33 2 3
34 1 5
35 0 7
36 4 0
37 3 2
38 2 4
39 1 6
40 0 8
41 4 1
42 3 3
43 2 5
44 1 7
45 0 9
A pattern starts to show 35-39 ; 40-44 and so on.
<span>During the recent financial crisis, many financial managers and corporate officers have been criticized for (c) Large salaries. This criticism is certainly justified given that most executives received exorbitant compensation despite a plunge in the value of their companies. Thus, their salaries are not justifiable as they are not serving the needs of the shareholders whose interest they should serve. </span>
