Strategic alliances generally include the risk of one partner will make advantage of the other's information to strengthen its own competitive position.
A strategic alliance is an agreement between two businesses to work together on a project that will benefit both parties while maintaining their individual freedom. Compared to a joint venture, which sees two companies combine resources to form a new company, the arrangement is simpler and less legally enforceable.
The collaboration between Spotify and Uber is a well-known example of a strategic alliance. Due to their strategic partnership, Uber customers may log in to Spotify and listen to their favorite music while riding.
To learn more about Strategic alliance
brainly.com/question/14014533
#SPJ4
Answer:
$116.28
Explanation:
This can be calculated as follows:
Mark up = [1 ÷ (1 - Lerner index)]
Price = Mark-up × Marginal cost
= [1 ÷ (1 - 0.57)] × $50
Price = [1 ÷ 0.43] × $50 = $116.28
Therefore, the price this firm will charge its customers is $116.28.
Pay discrepancies i believe
Answer:
Debit Expenses $90,000; credit Accrued wages and salary $90,000
Explanation:
If we assume that the City of Juneau maintains its books and records to facilitate the preparation of its fund financial statements. The employees paid from the general fund had earned $90,000 on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday (June 28, 29, and 30).
The entry, if any, should be made in the city’s general fund on June 30 is to: Debit Expenses $90,000; credit Accrued wages and salary $90,000
The amount has been incurred in the month but has not been paid hence it has to be captured as expenses for the month of June while the double entry will be that the amount is captured as accrued wages signifying that it has not been paid within the period it was incurred
Answer:
a.
- The quality of goods available to consumers
- The costs of air and water pollution
- The value of babysitting services, when the babysitter is paid in cash and the transaction isn't reported to the government
b. investment; decreases; no overall change
Explanation:
a. GDP only measures goods that have monetary value so when a good cannot be properly quantified in terms of cash, it is difficult to account for it in GDP. Also, even if the good has monetary value for the Government was unaware of it, they will be unable to use it in the calculation of GDP.
For these reasons, the quality of goods available to consumers, the costs of air and water pollution and the value of babysitting services, when the babysitter is paid in cash and the transaction isn't reported to the government will not be a part of GDP calculation.
b.<em> When a U.S. company purchases and imports wood from Brazil to use to build new houses within the United States, this purchase increases the </em><em><u>investment</u></em><em> component of GDP while also </em><em><u>decreasing</u></em><em> net exports by the same amount. Therefore, the purchase of wood from Brazil causes </em><em><u>no overall change </u></em><em>in US GDP. </em>
Purchasing raw materials for use in production is considered Investment by GDP. However, since it was imported it will reduce Net Exports which means that the transaction would cancel itself out in the GDP calculation as it would both increase investment and decrease Net exports by the same amounts.
