I believe the blank is "mass."
Answer:
the drive-reduction theory
Explanation:
The drive-reduction theory is one of the theories of motivation.
This theory contains the idea that a physiological need creates a drive, which in turn motivates an organism to satisy their need.
The theory targets homeostasis or biological balance.
When there is a need such as lack of water, the need would cause a drive to be developed (thirst).
The drive would activate a response (search for water to drink).
The response is then terminated when the need has been satisfied.
Answer:
Prophase
Explanation:
During prophase, chromatin condenses into chromosomes, and the nuclear envelope, or membrane, breaks down. In animal cells, the centrioles near the nucleus begin to separate and move to opposite poles (sides) of the cell.
Latin I think. It's like nomenclature, or something like that. ☺
Answer:
•The relationship between the twist and the wild type flower in the first crossing is known as a COMPLETE DOMINANCE
•The relationship between the forked and the wild type flower in the second crossing is also known as a COMPLETE DOMINANCE
•The relationship between the pale and the wild type flower in the third crossing is known as an INCOMPLETE DOMINANCE
Explanation:
A complete dominance is characterised by having one of the genes (the dominant gene) in an heterozygous condition, completely masking the effect of the other (the recessive gene) of thesame allelic pair. E.g. if the genes in allelic is represented with Aa, "A" is said to completely dominate "a" if it does not allow "a" to Express itself phenotypically.
The heterozygous condition is always the result of the F1 generation
and the F2 generation of a Complete dominance is always characterised by a phenotypic ratio of 3:1 which is in line with the results gotten from the first crossing and the second crossing as stated in the question.
An complete dominance is characterised by having an intermediate progeny in the F1 generation which was evident in the result of the third crossing. Also a phenotypic ratio of 1:2:1 in the F2 generation is also a characteristic feature of an Incomplete dominance relationship which was also evident in the third crossing.
