Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
Explanation:
The Intolerable Acts were punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party. The laws were meant to punish the Massachusetts colonists for their defiance in the Tea Party protest in reaction to changes in taxation by the British Government.
Answer:
In Roman Empire, there a 2 amjor categories of people living in it. The previledged and the poor. The poorer citizens of Roman was unable to afford the food sold in the city hence the need for a subsidized and free alternative to be offered to them.
<em>In order to meet thier demands, the Roman government needs to purchase grains from Egypt because of its cost effectiveness. </em>
<em>Another major reason was on the need to maintain the peace of Rome through offering people access to buy the subsidized grains imported from Egypt.</em>
Explanation:
