Answer:
B. Bantu tribe members did not use relative size as a cue to depth
Explanation:
They found this out after telling members of the Bantu cultures to interpret a picture and compared it to the interpretation of picture made by European people.
The picture shows a hunter and an elephant that is far away from the hunter (which is why the elephant is drawn smaller). But as it turned out, the majority of Bantu people do not know that the size meant that the elephant is located far away. They just thought it's a small elephant.
Answer: The geography of Ancient Egypt was very unique and allowed Egypt to become a very successful civilization. Egypt's geography contributed all aspects of Ancient Egyptians lives such as the Nile River being their source of food, water, and transportation and the desert offering natural protection.
Explanation:
The correct answer <em>"c. social identification with a group can increase ingroup favoritism."</em>.
In the Jigsaw classroom work, Aronson demonstrated that when a group formed of students from different backgrounds is created and each member shares a specific role, there is a reduction in prejudice and stereotyping. Additionally, subjects tended to improve their relationships within-groups and out-groups.
The cave experiment, two groups of individuals from a similar social background were formed and put into a competition between each other. After the tasks they were assigned, there was a clear increase in prejudice and in-group favoritism from members of both groups.
Both experiments had a different focus on the same issue, which was that social affinity increases behaviors of prejudice and stereotypes in regards to other groups.
The essay should show your opinion and understanding of the past presidents' debates. As I do not have access to your interpretations of the debate, I cannot write the essay, but I will show you how to write it.
<h3>Essay structure</h3>
- Introduction: Write a short paragraph, about what this speech was and how inflation was a subject covered in it.
- Thesis statement: Write a single sentence, which should end your introduction. The thesis statement should show which candidate approached the topic of inflation most convincingly in your opinion.
- Body: Write two paragraphs. These paragraphs must be long because they are the ones where you will show your positions on the debate. In the first paragraph, you will show evidence that your thesis statement is correct, showing the reasons that make you believe that a candidate was more convincing and approached the subject correctly. In the second paragraph, you will criticize the way the other candidate approached the subject and show the reasons that make that candidate's arguments not convincing to you.
- Conclusion: You will write a short paragraph, where you will show and reinforce your thesis statement, reaffirming the candidate who was most efficient and how the words of this candidate were in line with the society of that time.
You will need to watch, listen or read the debate to write this essay and you can use articles that analyze the performance of the two candidates to strengthen your arguments.
Below you can see an example of how you can write the introduction and thesis statement for your essay:
<em>The debate between Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan was one of the major milestones of the 1980 presidential election. In that year, American society suffered from a lack of economic stability and rising inflation, which made this one of the most important issues in the debate. , which was best addressed by Reagan.</em>
Learn more about what inflation is:
brainly.com/question/15555995
#SPJ1
Answer:
A. The clean growth plan will provide tax incentives for local business to develop and manufacture pollution-control systems
Explanation:
The excerpt talks about a clean growth plan initiated by the Country of Remo for the purpose of developing pollution control systems. It also states that there are no companies in Remo that can produce pollution-control systems. Therefore, the plan would mostly benefit foreign exporters.
Option A would weaken the argument because it says that the clean growth plan would provide tax incentives or benefits for local businesses to develop and manufacture pollution-control systems. If this happens, there would be no room for foreign exporters as the passage says there would.
