Answer:
Stephen Douglas sponsored the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.
Explanation:
Everyone else are associated to the republican party and the party was formed because of this act it even got Lincoln out of political retirement.
Answer:
Following enclosure, crop yields and livestock output increased while at the same time productivity increased enough to create a surplus of labor. The increased labor supply is considered one of the factors facilitating the Industrial Revolution.
An understanding of the Enclosure Acts is necessary to place aspects of the Industrial Revolution in their proper context. The Industrial Revolution is often accused of driving poor laborers en masse out of the countryside and into urban factories, where they competed for a pittance in wages and lived in execrable circumstances.
In turn, the palpable misery of this class fueled the rise of a vigorous socialist movement that blamed the Industrial Revolution for the exploitation of the masses. (The socialists were aware of the impact of enclosure but ultimately blamed industrialization.) And exploitation by industrialists undoubtedly existed; for one thing, some used governmental means. But the masses were there to be exploited largely because powerful land owners had used political means to deny to peasants their traditional rural livelihood. Exploitation was possible because other opportunities had been legally denied.
It would be deceptively simplistic to blame the Enclosure Acts alone for the impoverishment usually ascribed to the Industrial Revolution. Many factors were in play. For example, the majority of people in pre-Industrial England dwelt in the countryside, where they often supplemented their income through cottage industries, especially the weaving of wool. This income evaporated with the advent of cheap cotton and industrialized methods of weaving it. Many influences contributed to the desperation of an unemployed army of workers.
What enclosure does illustrate without question, however, is that the abuses ascribed to the Industrial Revolution are far from straightforward. Blaming industrialization for workers’ misery is not merely simplistic, it is also often incorrect. Whether or not some exploitation would have existed within free-market industrialization, the abuses of the Industrial Revolution were standardized, institutionalized, and carried to excess by government and the use of the political means.
(The tenants displaced by the process often left the countryside to work in the towns. This contributed to the Industrial Revolution – at the very moment new technological advances required large numbers of workers, a concentration of large numbers of people in need of work had emerged; the former country tenants and their descendants became workers in industrial factories within cities.)
Answer and Explanation:
The struggle for civil rights was part of a global movement for human rights because of the plurality of issues it sought to address and the similarity with the struggle of other peoples around the world. Furthermore, the most important thing was that the fight for civil rights was a reality in all countries that suffered European imperialism, becoming a movement that extended beyond the USA and established itself in almost the entire western world, making this cause a humanitarian cause and part of the search for human rights worldwide.
I'm a 12 year old single pringle and I'll never be ready to mingle UmU just a moment- *walks behind curtain and sobs* *suddenly becomes silent* *walks back out from behind curtain* ah okay, where were we?
One of the main reasons hoover lost the election of 1932 is because : Americans felt hoover's reform had not done enough to help them directly
No only dead, Roosevelt's plan in dealing the great depression during that time proven to significantly improved the condition of massive unemployment that directly help a lot of citizen.
hope this helps
