Answer:
9
Step-by-step explanation:
we know by definition that
so now we evaluate
and if we want to do an extra step
which works.
Let the amount invested at 4% be = x
Let the amount invested at 3% be = y
Given is:
or 
.... (1)
As, total income for the two investments is $194, so equation is:
....(2)
Putting value of x from (1) in (2)
And x=5200-y
Hence, money invested at 4% is $3800 and money invested at 3% is $1400
Answer:
Option D y=-3x^2 +4
Step-by-step explanation:
This is the correct answer because the graph is going down which shows that it is negative and the y intersect is +4
Answer: 7/20
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
